Publication
“AI and sustainability - cure or curse?”
While AI can help resolve data issues in sustainable investing, it can create problems such as information breaches and inherent bias in data.
Author:
United States | Publication | October 2020
On June 30, 2020, the Department of Justice's Antitrust Division (DOJ or Division), and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced the release of new Vertical Merger Guidelines (VMG). These guidelines are instructive for the agencies' review of vertical mergers and acquisitions and will be persuasive but not binding on courts in litigation challenges to vertical mergers.
Vertical mergers combine firms or assets that operate at different stages of the distribution chain, although the analytical framework described in the Guidelines also applies to "diagonal" mergers (which combine firms or assets at different stages of competing supply chains) and vertical issues that arise in mergers of complements. By contrast, horizontal mergers are transactions that take place between direct competitors.
The new VMG rely heavily on the legal and economic theories and analytical framework set forth in the 2010 Horizontal Merger Guidelines (2010 HMG), and are explicitly intended to be read in conjunction with the 2010 HMG. The VMG state that horizontal considerations such as the analytic framework for evaluating entry considerations, the treatment of the acquisition of a failing firm or its assets, and the acquisition of a partial ownership interest are relevant to the evaluation of the competitive effects of vertical mergers as well.
Addressing the issues specific to vertical transactions, the VMG include modern approaches such as identifying relevant markets and related products; identifying market participants, market shares, and market concentration; analyzing evidence of adverse competitive effects, unilateral effects and coordinated effects; and efficiencies.
Some of the highlights of the VMG include:
Notably, the language in the 2020 Draft Vertical Merger Guidelines (2020 Draft VMG) creating a 20-percent market share screen was removed. And while the 2020 Draft VMG only discussed vertical mergers, the final VMG include complementary and diagonal transactions.
FTC Commissioners Rohit Chopra and Rebecca Slaughter both dissented, arguing that the VMG support the flawed assumption that vertical mergers are presumptively benign or procompetitive. Commissioner Chopra expressed concern that the guidelines failed to "address the many ways that vertical transactions may suppress new entry," while Commissioner Slaughter challenged the VMG's "over-emphasis on the benefits of vertical mergers," its treatment of the elimination of double marginalization, and the omission of other important competition concerns.
Publication
While AI can help resolve data issues in sustainable investing, it can create problems such as information breaches and inherent bias in data.
Publication
In this edition of Regulation Around the World we review recent steps that financial services regulatory authorities have taken as regards investment research.
Publication
n a long-running dispute, taking in no less than three arbitrations spanning 26 years cumulatively (involving allegations of state interference in the arbitral process), the Court has provided useful guidance on the ss.67 and 68 challenges, particularly in the context of investor-state claims.
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest legal news, information and events . . .
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2023